There’s been some chatter lately about changing the MLB postseason structure. Here’s the synposis:
MLB is considering a move in which each league would have three division winners and four wild-card teams making the postseason starting in 2022, sources said. The best team in the league would receive a bye into the division series. The two remaining division winners and the wild-card team with the best record of the four would each host all games of a best-of-three series in the opening round.
Once the teams clinch and the regular season ends, the plan gets congested:
- The division winner with the second-best record would select its wild-card opponent from the three wild-card winners not hosting a series.
- The division winner with the worst record would then choose its opponent from the remaining two wild-card teams.
- The final matchup would pit the wild-card winner with the best record against the wild-card team not yet chosen.
Wait, what was that second bullet point?
The division winner with the worst record would then choose its opponent from the remaining two wild-card teams.
WTF?
There have been a number books — not to mention hundreds of articles — several coming in the late-’80s and mid-90’s that purport to tell us what’s wrong with the game and how to fix it. (Bill James devotes a chapter in his latest Handbook to improvements both major and minor, which I will address point-by-point in a future entry.) It’s interesting to note that a lot of these come from former players who become commentators in retirement; State of Play: The Old School Guide to New School Baseball
, by Bill Ripken, is the latest in this genre.
- Fair Ball: A Fan’s Case for Baseball
, by Bob Costas
- Just Play Ball
, by Joe Garagiola
- Smart Baseball
, by Buddy Bell
- Long Balls, No Strikes: What Baseball Must Do to Keep the Good Times Rolling
, by Joe Morgan
- Confessions of a Baseball Purist: What’s Right–and Wrong–with Baseball, as Seen from the Best Seat in the House
, by Jon Miller
- Watching Baseball: Discovering the Game within the Game
, by Jerry Remy
Are there things that are wrong with the game that should be examined? Of course, but as I see it, tossing this spaghetti on the wall in the hope that something sticks with the television audience — because, let’s be honest, that’s who all this is really for — is not the answer.
Comments on this entry are closed.