Just received the revised edition of The Hidden Game of Baseball: A Revolutionary Approach to Baseball and Its Statistics by John Thorn and Pete Palmer. Quite looking forward to it after I finish several New York-centric books for a feature for Bookreporter.com. (The original edition is included in 501 Baseball Books Fans Must Read before They Die
.)
If you know anything at all about me, it’s that I have an aversion to math (and baseball fiction). Which is a paradox, since I excelled in it at school. The intervening years have not been kind to my computational/analytic abilities. When it comes to baseball, I think this is due to an inability to just shut up and accept the various formulas used to arrive at the metric in question. I mean, I can do the math, as it were, but I get hung up on how the creators of these things decide that it should be — and I’m making this up — A= (.75 x 3) + (B/4), rather than (.55 x 3) + (B/8). Overthinking; it’s a curse. As that eminent philosopher Tim McCarver said, “You think long, you think wrong.”
Nevertheless, I think I speak for a lot of readers when I say I’m anxious (in a good way, not a fearful way) to see how the authors have either stuck to their guns since the book was originally published a generation (30 years) ago or evolved as new information has been accepted into the statistical vernacular.
![]() |
![]() |
That was then… | This is now |
.
Comments on this entry are closed.