* Radomski book just won't go away

January 25, 2009

According to Michael S. Schmidt’s article in today’s Sunday Times, “Contradictions in Book Seem to Benefit Clemens.” Basically it’s Radomski vs. Brain McNamee in claims about who knew what when.

One paragraph sums up the whole situation,

“In a perjury case a prosecutor’s worst nightmare is for a witness to make public statements that contradicts another witness, especially the key witness in the case,” said Mathew Rosengart, a partner at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips in New York and a former federal prosecutor. “Perjury cases are almost always a he-said, she-said dispute, and there usually isn’t a smoking gun, so corroboration of witnesses is essential. The questions about Radomski are a good thing for Clemens’s defense.”

So which weasel do you choose to believe?

0Shares

Tagged as: Brian McNamee, Kirk Radomski, PED, Roger Clemens, steroids

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post:

script type="text/javascript"> var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-5496371-4']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })();