That is, according to this entry onthe Yankee-centric RiverAvenueBlues blog regarding Peter Golenbock’s latest release,George: The Poor Little Rich Boy Who Built the Yankees Empire.
Why isn’t George higher up on my reading list? Other than having more interesting books ahead of it, there’s another reason: factual accuracy. Murray Chass (h/t BBTF) points to Goldenbock’s history of inaccuracies, and warns of much the same from George. This isn’t just Chass’s criticism; these errors have been acknowledged by the book’s publisher…John Wiley & Sons, which said in part, “Regarding Peter Golenbock’s book, we are currently taking steps internally to correct the errors which will be reflected in the next reprint.”
So how many errors are we talking about here?
Sixty-eight factual errors. Don’t they pay people to go through books and find these? It might seem like Chass nitpicks with some of these errors, but I don’t take issue at all. If Golenbock is making simple errors on things like hotel names and the handedness of a batter (uh, Duke Snider was a righty?), what other lazy errors is he making? (emphasis in the original)
This has always been a bugaboo for me. I’ve spoken with publishers’ representatives about this and they said they just don’t have the personnel to check every fact. It’s up to the author to make sure he’s got his stuff together; you won’t always get an editor who’s an expert on the subject.
It’s a safe bet that the majority of the readers — even those well versed on the topic— might not catch these mistakes. But whenever I do, I wonder how many more I’ve haven’t found and that detracts from the reading experience.










